BBC News Anchor Declines to Say Specific Word On-Air

BBC Presenter Sparks Debate After On-Air Word Choice

During a live broadcast, BBC news anchor Martine Croxall made headlines after skipping a term in the teleprompter—one she felt uncomfortable using. Her subtle correction quickly ignited a social media firestorm.

A Quiet Rewording With a Loud Reaction

While reporting on heat-related health risks during rising UK temperatures, Croxall read from the autocue. When the script referred to “pregnant people,” she paused, corrected it to “women,” and gave a deliberate glance—signaling her choice was intentional.

“Malcom Mistry, who was involved in the research, says that the aged, pregnant people—women—and those with pre-existing health conditions need to take precautions,” she said on-air.

Croxall Speaks Out

After the broadcast, Croxall took to social media to thank followers for their support.

“A huge thank you to everyone who has chosen to follow me today for whatever reason. It’s been quite a ride…” she wrote.

The 56-year-old anchor has worked at the BBC for over 30 years and acknowledged she may face consequences. She admitted she’s “braced” for a conversation with senior management.

A Divisive Term: “Pregnant People”

The term “pregnant people” is commonly used to include non-binary and trans individuals who may be pregnant. However, it remains controversial, especially among critics who oppose gender-inclusive language.

Croxall has previously stated her views, once saying during a debate with a trans activist that “s*x is binary and immutable.”

J.K. Rowling Backs Croxall

British author J.K. Rowling praised Croxall’s choice on X (formerly Twitter), writing:

“I have a new favourite BBC presenter.”

Rowling, known for her outspoken views on gender and s*x, quickly became part of the discussion.

A National Conversation

Croxall’s moment on air touches on a much broader debate happening in many countries—how language adapts in discussions around gender identity and inclusivity. Some see inclusive terms as progress, while others view them as erasing biological definitions.