hit counter html code

Texas Supreme Court Slows Abbott’s Push to Remove Democratic Lawmakers

The Texas Supreme Court has rejected Governor Greg Abbott’s request for an immediate ruling on whether Democratic lawmakers who fled the state can be removed from office, opting instead for a longer review process.

Abbott had urged the court to act within 48 hours after House Democrats left Texas in early August to prevent a quorum and stall a vote on new congressional maps. But instead of a fast-track decision, justices gave both sides three weeks to file briefs, with responses due by September 4 — well after the current special session is expected to end, according to the Texas Tribune.

Abbott and Paxton Align on Lawsuit

Despite the delay, Abbott framed the move as progress, saying the briefing schedule moves Democratic leaders “closer to consequences.” His lawsuit targets Rep. Gene Wu of Houston, chair of the House Democratic Caucus, while a separate suit from Attorney General Ken Paxton seeks to remove Wu and 12 additional Democrats.

Though Abbott and Paxton initially clashed over who had the authority to pursue the case, Paxton has since said he looks forward to working alongside the governor to “hold these lawmakers accountable.”

Democrats’ Quorum-Busting Tactic

On August 3, dozens of Democratic members left the state, denying the House enough members to conduct business. The walkout was intended to block passage of the GOP’s proposed redistricting plan, which was introduced after pressure from former President Donald Trump. Trump has called for maps that would give Republicans up to five additional seats in Congress, bolstering the party’s narrow majority ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

Democrats argue the redistricting push is a partisan attempt to cement Republican control, while critics note that Democratic-led states have employed similar gerrymandering strategies in the past.

Historic Move on the Line

No Texas legislator has ever been forcibly removed from office for breaking quorum. The Supreme Court’s eventual ruling could set a precedent with major implications for both parties — particularly as redistricting battles intensify nationwide.

K

Related Posts

Your Ability to Spot Triangles Might Indicate Narcissism

How Many Triangles Do You See? At first glance, the image seems simple — just a few colorful triangles stacked together. But look closer, and the count…

Dylan Dreyer’s Son’s Mysterious Illness Left Doctors Baffled — Until One Test Revealed the Unthinkable

Months of mystery Dylan Dreyer’s six‑year‑old son, Calvin Bradley Fichera, began complaining of sharp stomach pains that persisted for months. She and husband Brian Fichera went through…

Our deepest sympathies are with Sandra Bullock and her loved ones as they cope with this heartbreaking loss

A Moment of Loss and Pause Our deepest sympathies are with Sandra Bullock and her loved ones as they cope with the heartbreaking loss of her partner,…

Donald Trump Sparks More Health Concerns After ‘Mysterious Lump’ Spotted

President Trump has sparked new health concerns after people allegedly spotted a ‘mysterious lump’ on his body. It’s been a year full of speculation surrounding the US…

Donald Trump Announces ‘Tariff Dividend’ — How Much Americans Might Get

Americans Could See a $2,000 “Tariff Dividend” Donald Trump has hinted that Americans might be in line for a significant payout from so-called “tariff dividends.” Republicans have…

‘Dynasty’ & ‘The Paper Chase’ star dies at 98

Soap opera fans are mourning the loss of a true TV classic. Betty Harford, the beloved actress who charmed audiences for nearly a decade as the Carrington…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *