hit counter html code

Texas Supreme Court Slows Abbott’s Push to Remove Democratic Lawmakers

The Texas Supreme Court has rejected Governor Greg Abbott’s request for an immediate ruling on whether Democratic lawmakers who fled the state can be removed from office, opting instead for a longer review process.

Abbott had urged the court to act within 48 hours after House Democrats left Texas in early August to prevent a quorum and stall a vote on new congressional maps. But instead of a fast-track decision, justices gave both sides three weeks to file briefs, with responses due by September 4 — well after the current special session is expected to end, according to the Texas Tribune.

Abbott and Paxton Align on Lawsuit

Despite the delay, Abbott framed the move as progress, saying the briefing schedule moves Democratic leaders “closer to consequences.” His lawsuit targets Rep. Gene Wu of Houston, chair of the House Democratic Caucus, while a separate suit from Attorney General Ken Paxton seeks to remove Wu and 12 additional Democrats.

Though Abbott and Paxton initially clashed over who had the authority to pursue the case, Paxton has since said he looks forward to working alongside the governor to “hold these lawmakers accountable.”

Democrats’ Quorum-Busting Tactic

On August 3, dozens of Democratic members left the state, denying the House enough members to conduct business. The walkout was intended to block passage of the GOP’s proposed redistricting plan, which was introduced after pressure from former President Donald Trump. Trump has called for maps that would give Republicans up to five additional seats in Congress, bolstering the party’s narrow majority ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

Democrats argue the redistricting push is a partisan attempt to cement Republican control, while critics note that Democratic-led states have employed similar gerrymandering strategies in the past.

Historic Move on the Line

No Texas legislator has ever been forcibly removed from office for breaking quorum. The Supreme Court’s eventual ruling could set a precedent with major implications for both parties — particularly as redistricting battles intensify nationwide.

K

Related Posts

Outrage Erupts After ‘Wheel of Fortune’ Won’t Award Woman for Correct Response

Note: we are republishing this story which originally made the news in January 2024. Megan’s Disputed Win Fans erupted after “Wheel of Fortune” seemingly denied contestant Megan…

People are coming out as ‘Berrisexual’ – here’s what it means

Berrisexual is a new term. Credit: Shutterstock Here at Newsner, we’ve explained ‘graysexual‘, ‘demisexual‘ and ‘almondsexual‘ over the past year or so, bringing our readers up to speed as…

A Teen Bully Cornered My Son — He Didn’t Know I Wasn’t Just A Dad But A Man With A Badge

The fluorescent hum of the 7-Eleven sign buzzed overhead, a flickering, sickly electric heartbeat against the bruised purple of the Chicago sky. It was late October, a…

Kenny Rogers fathered twins in his 60s – died when they were just 15

Kenny Rogers, the legendary country music icon, lived a life woven with fame, fortune, and numerous relationships. Known for his soulful voice and chart-topping hits, his personal…

What you see first says a lot about your personality

Have you ever looked at a picture and instantly seen something that a friend claims they don’t see? Maybe it’s a hidden face, a pair of animals,…

The real story on whether Obama received $40 million in Obamacare royalties amid Trump’s shocking claim

The Viral Post President Donald Trump used Truth Social to reshare a post about former President Barack Obama. The post repeated an old claim: Obama had earned…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *