hit counter html code

Texas Supreme Court Slows Abbott’s Push to Remove Democratic Lawmakers

The Texas Supreme Court has rejected Governor Greg Abbott’s request for an immediate ruling on whether Democratic lawmakers who fled the state can be removed from office, opting instead for a longer review process.

Abbott had urged the court to act within 48 hours after House Democrats left Texas in early August to prevent a quorum and stall a vote on new congressional maps. But instead of a fast-track decision, justices gave both sides three weeks to file briefs, with responses due by September 4 — well after the current special session is expected to end, according to the Texas Tribune.

Abbott and Paxton Align on Lawsuit

Despite the delay, Abbott framed the move as progress, saying the briefing schedule moves Democratic leaders “closer to consequences.” His lawsuit targets Rep. Gene Wu of Houston, chair of the House Democratic Caucus, while a separate suit from Attorney General Ken Paxton seeks to remove Wu and 12 additional Democrats.

Though Abbott and Paxton initially clashed over who had the authority to pursue the case, Paxton has since said he looks forward to working alongside the governor to “hold these lawmakers accountable.”

Democrats’ Quorum-Busting Tactic

On August 3, dozens of Democratic members left the state, denying the House enough members to conduct business. The walkout was intended to block passage of the GOP’s proposed redistricting plan, which was introduced after pressure from former President Donald Trump. Trump has called for maps that would give Republicans up to five additional seats in Congress, bolstering the party’s narrow majority ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

Democrats argue the redistricting push is a partisan attempt to cement Republican control, while critics note that Democratic-led states have employed similar gerrymandering strategies in the past.

Historic Move on the Line

No Texas legislator has ever been forcibly removed from office for breaking quorum. The Supreme Court’s eventual ruling could set a precedent with major implications for both parties — particularly as redistricting battles intensify nationwide.

K

Related Posts

At his son’s grave, he spotted a boy wearing the identical shirt his son had worn

An Impossible Encounter Ethan’s mind spun, thoughts colliding like bumper cars. He struggled to make sense of the scene before him. Logic offered no answers. Only the…

A storm brought down a 115-foot version of the Statue of Liberty

Powerful Storm Strikes Late Tuesday, a powerful storm swept through Guaíba, Brazil, toppling a massive 115-foot replica of the Statue of Liberty. Fierce winds and heavy rain battered…

Don’t be fooled by its look—this device had a revolutionary role!

A Relic from a Bold Era What you’ve discovered is a relic from a bold, indulgent period in grooming, when innovation pushed boundaries. Companies experimented with ways…

These are the facts authorities have confirmed so far in the case

A Coordinated Effort Careful planning and coordination led to a two-week operation targeting North Florida’s most vulnerable missing children. In December, the U.S. Marshals Service spearheaded the…

The Mortgage They Tried to Force Me to Pay: My Family’s Shocking Double Standard

A Life of Responsibility My name is Cassandra Wilson, I’m 32, and until six months ago, I thought I had my life figured out. I worked as…

Stage 4 Cancer Battle: Actress Shares Heartfelt Hospital Update

Magda Szubanski, one of Australia’s most beloved comedians, actors, and cultural icons, has long been celebrated for her warmth, humor, and relatability. From her breakout role as…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *