Person sends latest Epstein files to AI to see its response on Trump allegations

After reviewing the final Jeffrey Epstein files, an AI chatbot concluded that while there’s “no smoking gun” to prove Donald Trump’s guilt, there’s still the “uncomfortable reality” that any “airtight evidence” – if it existed – was “destroyed long ago” or “still legally sealed.”

On January 30, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) released its largest dump to date under the Epstein Transparency Act. It includes more than 3 million pages, 180,000 images, and 2,000 videos, all linked to the late financier’s sprawling web of associates, activities, and investigations.

While many of the names listed – Elon Musk, Bill Gates, Richard Branson, and the former Prince Andrew among them – have appeared in Epstein-related reporting before, the sheer scale of this drop, and the depth of its detail, stunned even seasoned observers.

But the section drawing the most attention involves President Donald Trump, who appears more than 1,000 times in the files.

Trump allegedly raped 13-year-old

Some of the references that include the 79-year-old president are harmless, such as social calendars, flight logs, and party invitations.

Others, however, are more serious, including unverified claims of sexual assault, anonymous calls to the FBI’s National Threat Operation Center and interviews with alleged victims.

According to CNN, one entry refers to a civil lawsuit that alleged Trump raped a 13-year-old – an accusation the president has repeatedly denied, and which was later dropped. It also says Epstein, who raped the girl as well, was allegedly “angry that Trump was the one to take Doe’s virginity.”

Despite the volume of allegations, the DOJ emphasized “the production may include fake or falsely submitted images, documents or videos,” and does not prove criminal wrongdoing by Trump as “everything that was sent to the FBI by the public was included.”

The day following the dump, Trump spoke with reporters on Air Force One and said: “I didn’t see it myself, but I was told by some very important people that not only does it absolve me, it’s the opposite of what people were hoping – you know, the radical left.”

AI reacts to Trump allegations

Curious about how an artificial intelligence system would process the massive drop, a YouTuber known as

</p> <div class="video-embed"><iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/NEqOarRQCbE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen">

“I sent AI the NEW Epstein files and let it react to ALLEGATIONS against Trump,” the user titled the video where he asks, “Tell me what you think about this drop. Does it confirm or disprove anything?”

“This drop was underwhelming. Big volume, lots of noise, very little new substance,” AI responded.

The chatbot clarified that the files did not expose a so-called “master list” of offenders, a “secret blackmail operation or a coordinated cover up by specific public figures.”

However, it did acknowledge the significance of the repeated appearances of certain high-profile individuals – including Trump – and the pattern of “casual association” with Epstein, even after his criminal conviction in 2008 for soliciting sex from a minor.

When asked specifically about the POTUS, the AI explained that although his name “shows up across different years, different complainants, and different context,” the material “does not establish guilt.” It added that “repetition alone proves nothing, but it also can’t be waved away.”

Institutional failure, not a ‘smoking gun’

The chatbot continued its analysis, stating: “This file doesn’t deliver a verdict on Trump. What it exposes is a system that let Epstein operate near power for years while accusations accumulated and went nowhere. The failure here is institutional, not evidentiary closure.”

In short, the AI emphasized that the files reveal systemic breakdowns in accountability, not definitive conclusions about any individual’s criminal behavior.

“But” it added, “skepticism can’t be used as an escape hatch. These aren’t internet rumors. They’re complaints logged by law enforcement. Sometimes reviewed, sometimes flagged, sometimes left unresolved.”

Concluding its report, the chatbot said “the drop doesn’t move anyone from suspected to proven. No new charges, no smoking gun documents, no clear transactional evidence.” But “it also quietly confirms another uncomfortable reality. If there was ever airtight evidence against additional powerful people, it’s not in this release. Either it never existed, it was destroyed long ago, or it’s still legally sealed.”

As more users and journalists dig into the 3 million pages now available to the public, the story of Epstein’s reach – and the institutional systems that failed to stop him – continues to unfold.