More than two decades after her highly publicized affair with President Bill Clinton, Monica Lewinsky is continuing to speak out — not only about the relationship itself but about the lasting effects of the power dynamics and public humiliation she endured.

On a recent episode of the How to Fail podcast with host Elizabeth Day, Lewinsky revisited the scandal that defined much of her early adulthood.

She opened up about the relationship she had with Clinton between the ages of 22 and 24, acknowledging the complexity of her feelings at the time — and how her perspective has evolved with age.

“It was [a] 22- to 24-year-old young woman’s love. … The way we see love evolves with every relationship we have,” Lewinsky said, reflecting on the emotional intensity she experienced during her early twenties.

She continued, “That’s what I felt. I think there was some limerence there and all sorts of other things, but that’s how I saw it then. And I think it was also an abuse of power.”

This isn’t the first time Lewinsky has addressed the imbalance in the relationship. But her words on the podcast offered a deeper and more personal take on the emotional dynamics of the affair and how her understanding of power and consent has matured over time.

What she once believed to be love, she now recognizes as being inextricably tied to a stark imbalance in power — one that she was unequipped to fully grasp at the time.

The affair, which came to light in 1998, rocked the Clinton presidency and ignited a national firestorm. But it was Lewinsky — not Clinton — who bore the brunt of the public ridicule.

Cast as a seductress, a joke, and a national punchline, she was vilified in the press and cultural commentary. That, too, she believes, was no accident.

“I think that was a narrative that was crafted and put out by the White House, so I think it was picked up, that mantle was picked up by a lot of women,” she told Day.

The derogatory framing — epitomized by terms like “dumb bimbo” — didn’t just come from tabloids and comedians.

According to Lewinsky, the Clinton administration actively shaped the story to deflect blame and shift focus away from the president’s misconduct.

While Clinton was impeached by the House of Representatives in 1998 for perjury and obstruction of justice, he was later acquitted by the Senate and completed his term in office.

Lewinsky, meanwhile, became a symbol of scandal — her name synonymous with shame and controversy, often used as cultural shorthand for political downfall.

In a 2021 interview with CNN, Lewinsky laid bare the power dynamics at the heart of the scandal.

She described Clinton’s actions as “wholly inappropriate” and emphasized just how unbalanced the relationship truly was.

“I was 22, literally just out of college,” she said at the time.

“And I think that the power differentials there are something that I couldn’t ever fathom, consequences at 22 that I understand, obviously, so differently at 48.”

Now in her late forties, Lewinsky has emerged as a powerful voice against cyberbullying and public shaming.

Through TED Talks, essays, and interviews, she’s worked to reclaim her story and shed light on the broader cultural forces that punished her while protecting those in power.

Her recent comments underscore a broader societal shift in how we view power, consent, and accountability.

What once was dismissed as a “consensual affair” is now being reexamined through a more critical lens — one that questions whether true consent is even possible in situations where such extreme power disparities exist.

By continuing to speak out, Lewinsky is not only reframing her own narrative but also challenging the public to consider how power, gender, and institutional influence shape our perceptions of scandal and victimhood.

In revisiting the most painful chapter of her life, Lewinsky is offering more than just reflection — she’s providing a roadmap for cultural reckoning.