hit counter html code

Math problem from 2019 divides the internet

In a world where social media thrives on polarizing debates, one would hardly expect a math problem to spark such a heated conversation. But one equation did just that.

In 2019, a seemingly simple math equation became a viral problem for social media users and “practically caused a civil war in thePopular Mechanics  office.”

At its core, this wasn’t just about math; it was a cultural phenomenon, showcasing how people interpret rules differently and, sometimes, fiercely defend their perspectives.

Let’s break down the drama and explore why this problem  became so controversial.

Math isn’t always fun

The problem reads:
8 ÷ 2(2 + 2)

At first glance, it seems straightforward. But the simplicity is deceptive. Depending on how you interpret the order of operations, the answer could either be 1 or 16.

According to the PEMDAS/BODMAS rule (Parentheses/Brackets, Exponents/Orders, Multiplication and Division, Addition and Subtraction), equations or problems should be solved in the order specified by the acronym, starting with parentheses, followed by exponents, and continuing through the remaining operations – always working from left to right.

This means that the 2 + 2 in the parenthesis should be solved first, leaving people with 8 ÷ 2 x 4. After this, the equation calls for solving the leftmost operation first, so 8 ÷ 2 must be solved first rather than 2 x 4.

This gives us 4, leading to 4 x 4, equaling 16.

  • 2 + 2 = 4
  • 8 ÷ 4 = 4
  • 4 x 4 = 16

However, a significant portion of the online community disagrees with this interpretation, including some mathematicians   who are well-versed in the subject.

Mike Breen of the American Mathematical Society Public Awareness Office said, “the way it’s written, it’s ambiguous.”

Working with Popular Mechanics in solving this equation, Breen adds “In math, a lot of times there are ambiguities. Mathematicians try to make rules as precise as possible. According to strict order of operations, you’d get 16, but I wouldn’t hit someone on the wrist with a ruler if they said 1.”

The case for 1

How did they get 1 as an answer?

The team followed the PEMDAS rule but interpreted it differently. While they agreed that the 2 + 2 inside the parentheses should be  solved first, they argued that the resulting sum should be treated as if it were still within parentheses, essentially rewriting the equation as 8 ÷ 2(4), which gives us 1.

Weighing in on the massive problem, Rhett Allain, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Physics at Southeastern Louisiana University, says “This is the math version of, ‘What color is this dress? Blue and black or gold and white?’”

Rhett says the answer is 16.

“Of course this isn’t math. This is convention. We have conventions on how to write these things just like we have conventions on how to spell stuff. But still, there are different conventions. Some people spell it as ‘gray’ and others as ‘grey.’” He adds, “We still understand what’s going on. For me, I would write this more explicitly so that there is no confusion…That way no one will get it wrong.”

Whether you’re on team 16 or team 1, this viral phenomenon proves one thing: math has never been so confusing or more entertaining! So, which side are you on? Let us know in the comments!  

K

Related Posts

My daughter’s tearful voice came through the line: “Dad… Mom’s boyfriend and his friends are here

The Call That Changed Everything The room was dim, the curtains drawn against the world outside. Jeremiah’s mind raced. Emily’s urgent call still echoed in his ears….

In an emotional holiday note, 53-year-old ex-Sen. Ben Sasse reveals his terminal stage 4 cancer diagnosis

Ben Sasse Reveals Terminal Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis Former Nebraska Senator Ben Sasse announced he has been diagnosed with terminal stage 4 pancreatic cancer. The 53-year-old Republican shared the news in…

I Paid for a Homeless Man’s Groceries – The Next Day, He Greeted Me as a CEO at My Job Interview

Emma trudged through the rain, her sweater clinging to her soaked skin as the relentless downpour seeped into every fiber. Each step felt heavier than the last,…

Découverte de Betify Casino – Analyse 22

Dans un environnement hautement concurrentiel, la différenciation devient cruciale, et Betify Casino s’inscrit dans cette évolution. Cette analyse numéro 22 examine les caractéristiques structurantes de cette plateforme…

Stephen Miller Lays Out Just How Successful Trump Has Been in 11 Months [WATCH]

Stephen Miller said the past 11 months represent the most successful period in American presidential history, pointing to strong economic growth, lower energy prices, expanding exports, and…

Analyse Complète de Betify Casino – Revue 105

Le divertissement numérique ne cesse de se réinventer, et Betify Casino s’inscrit pleinement dans cette dynamique. Cette analyse numéro 105 examine les caractéristiques qui façonnent l’identité de…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *