hit counter html code

Federal Judge Broadens Ruling Blocking Trump from Cutting Funds to Sanctuary Cities

Judge Expands Ban on Trump Withholding Funds to Sanctuary Cities

A San Francisco federal judge has expanded an order preventing the Trump administration from cutting federal funds to sanctuary cities. These jurisdictions refuse to cooperate fully with federal immigration authorities.

Orrick Extends Injunction

U.S. District Judge William Orrick, appointed by President Barack Obama, extended his earlier injunction on Friday. He ruled that the administration tried to coerce local officials into assisting agencies like Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Orrick called this action unconstitutional.

More Cities Join the Lawsuit

The judge added additional municipalities to the order, including Los Angeles, Chicago, Boston, Baltimore, Denver, and Albuquerque. These cities had joined the lawsuit against Trump’s funding policy, CBS reported.

Background of the Lawsuit

The case began in February, led by San Francisco and supported by 16 cities and counties nationwide. Initial plaintiffs included Minneapolis, St. Paul, New Haven, Portland, Santa Fe, and Seattle. All of these cities restrict local law enforcement from helping federal authorities with immigration arrests.

The lawsuit challenged Trump’s executive order titled “Protecting the American People Against Invasion.” The order directed the Department of Homeland Security to withhold funds from sanctuary jurisdictions. The cities argued that billions of federal dollars were at risk.

Historical Context

This is not the first time Judge Orrick ruled against a similar Trump policy. In 2017, the president issued a comparable order, and Orrick blocked it. He also issued a preliminary injunction in April for the current case, noting, “Here we are again.”

Constitutional Concerns

Orrick stated that withholding funds violates the 10th Amendment, which separates national and local government powers. The Trump administration has appealed the decision. In the latest action, the judge also blocked the administration from attaching immigration-related conditions to two grant programs, according to Fox News.

Support for Sanctuary Cities

Supporters argue that forcing cooperation with federal immigration enforcement can discourage undocumented individuals from reporting crimes or serving as witnesses.

Orrick emphasized the stakes in April, saying, “The threat to withhold funding causes irreparable injury, including budget uncertainty, deprivation of constitutional rights, and erosion of trust between cities, counties, and the communities they serve.”

Next Steps

Neither the White House nor the Department of Homeland Security has commented on the expanded ruling.

K

Related Posts

Онлайн‑казино в Казахстане перестало быть просто развлечением — оно превращается в арену для борьбы за идентичность и мечту. Mellstroy game врывается на рынок как символ новой цифровой…

온라인 카지노 수락 마스터카드: 종합 가이드

온라인 도박의 문은 조용히 열리지만, 그 안에서 벌어지는 선택은 결코 가볍지 않습니다. 편리함, 보안, 보너스의 유혹이 한꺼번에 밀려오죠. 마스터카드를 받는 카지노들은 더 많은 게임, 더 빠른 입금,…

Where to Find Free Demo Casino Slots

You’re told it’s “just a demo.” No registration, no download, no deposit. But behind every free spin, every fake coin, a real industry is quietly shaping how…

Genuine Cash Slots Online PayPal: A Guide to Playing and Winning

The money leaves your bank in silence. The reels explode in color and sound. And with PayPal, it all happens in a single, effortless click. Convenience feels…

The Ultimate Overview to Online Slot Machine for Real Money

You think you’re just spinning for fun. Then the money starts vanishing. Fast. What if the game isn’t nearly as simple as it looks? What if the…

Азарт в Казахстане меняется быстрее, чем успевают писать законы. Онлайн‑казино вырвались из тени и стали частью повседневности — яркой, шумной, манящей. Миллионы ставок, агрессивные бонусы, обещания быстрых…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *