Since stepping back into the role of President, Donald Trump has been swift in executing a range of orders and policy changes echoing his campaign commitments. His administration stands firm on immigration, national security, and boosting economic growth while overturning several plans from the previous administration.

One of Trump’s first actions was to bring back strict border enforcement like the “Remain in Mexico” policy, demanding asylum seekers to wait outside U.S. borders for their claims to be processed. He also inked an order to hike deportations of undocumented individuals and suggested doing away with birthright citizenship, though this faces impending legal battles. Cracking down on sanctuary cities, his administration has threatened to cut federal support for areas flouting federal immigration rules.

In terms of energy, Trump rolled back environmental regulations, putting focus on domestic oil and gas, pulling the U.S. from the Paris Climate Agreement again and lifting bans on drilling and pipelines. His team argues such steps could invigorate the economy and bolster energy self-reliance.

Socially, substantial shifts have taken place under Trump’s watch. Orders were signed to halt diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts within federal bodies and the military, and to withdraw federal aid from gender transition surgeries. He also staunchly opposed “woke ideology” in schools, suggesting new educational guidelines that push for patriotism and eschew what his administration terms as “left-wing indoctrination.”

In a move courting controversy, Trump granted clemency to over a thousand individuals involved in the January 6 Capitol events. His tenure saw a swathe of firings within the Justice Department, specifically targeting those engaged in legal proceedings against him, arousing worries on political meddling within the justice arena.

Recently, Trump has floated a radical policy to deport American repeat criminal offenders overseas. During a Miami meeting with House Republicans, he suggested the U.S. pay a “small fee” to other countries to accommodate these repeat felony offenders. Trump believes this could ease the prison system’s burden and save taxpayers’ money. His argument framed the deportation as a crime deterrence tool, stopping criminals from reoffending on American soil.

The concept has ignited a fiery discussion. Opponents hold that exiling American citizens infringes constitutional rights and stirs human rights quandaries. Legal professionals argue the near impossibility of countries agreeing to take on big numbers of convicted criminals and forecast major legal hurdles against such forced relocations. Comparisons were made to historical methods by Europeans shipping convicts to penal colonies, querying the relevance of such tactics in our present era.

Despite resistance, Trump’s supporters largely agree with the proposition, interpreting it as a crime-fighting initiative syncing with his grand vision for law and order. Although no clear framework exists on the policy’s execution, his administration intends to pursue all legal channels to actualize it.