hit counter html code

Dem Leader Jeffries Rips Supreme Court, Says It Has ‘Enabled’ Trump

Hakeem Jeffries Blames Supreme Court for Enabling Trump to “Act Like a King”

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) sharply criticized the Supreme Court on Monday during an interview on CNN’s The Situation Room, claiming that the justices had “enabled Donald Trump to behave like a king.” He called the Court’s recent actions “shameful” and said they had weakened accountability for presidential conduct.

Jeffries Warns of Delayed Accountability

Jeffries cautioned those aligned with Trump, saying, “For people doing the bidding of the Trump administration or engaging in its schemes, the statute of limitations is five years.”

He stressed that while Trump and his administration may eventually be gone, accountability could still come later. “That process begins now,” he said, “but it won’t be complete until we have an independent Department of Justice and a Democratic-led House of Representatives.”

Criticism of the Supreme Court’s Ruling

Jeffries accused the conservative justices of eroding the nation’s legal safeguards by extending broad presidential immunity in their recent ruling. The Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. United States, issued earlier this year, held that a president enjoys immunity for official acts but not for private conduct.

To Jeffries, the ruling went too far. “They’ve effectively allowed Donald Trump to act like a king,” he said. “The framers of the Constitution didn’t want a monarchy. Shame on the Supreme Court for what they’ve done to this country.”

Defending the Department of Justice

Jeffries also defended the Department of Justice, saying it remains one of the country’s most important institutions. “Donald Trump and these extremists have been destroying its integrity,” he said, urging voters to support efforts to restore independence within the DOJ.

Balancing Legal Reality and Political Rhetoric

While Jeffries’ remarks reflect strong political criticism, the Supreme Court’s immunity ruling did not grant a “blanket” protection from prosecution. It established that presidents are shielded for core constitutional duties but not for personal or campaign-related actions.

Still, Jeffries’ comments underscore the growing tension between Congress, the courts, and the executive branch as Trump seeks to return to the White House.

F

Related Posts

A WOMAN ON THE PLANE PROPPED HER FEET ON MY HUSBAND’S SEAT – I REACHED MY BREAKING POINT

A Subtle Plan Takes Shape I decided to handle the situation quietly but firmly. I needed to avoid a scene while still making my point. So, I…

Odd sounds coming from our bedroom wall led my husband to tear it down — and he found something terrifying

Strange Noises Shake the House Lately, unusual events had been happening in our home. It started with faint sounds — rustling and scratching from inside the walls….

Don’t Overlook This! What’s Really Causing That Weird Stuff in Your Drinking Water!

The Mystery of White Fibers in Hot Water One morning, I turned on my hot water—and out came stringy white stuff mixed with rusty flecks. Not exactly…

Student who tore out own eyeballs while high is fired from her job

A student who went viral after tearing out her own eyeballs while high on crystal meth has revealed she has “no regrets” after recently being fired from…

My glass stove top appears dirty and maybe even harmed — how should I handle this?

The Kitchen’s Heartbeat For most families, the kitchen is the center of daily life. It’s where coffee brews at dawn, Sunday dinners simmer, and conversations unfold. For…

They Ridiculed My Wife — I Reacted Automatically, Thanks to My Marine Training

A Night Meant for Peace Sarah and I celebrated our 25th anniversary with a quiet dinner. The steak was tender, the wine warm, and her black dress…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *