Media hypocrisy is once again under the spotlight as Chris Hayes of MSNBC faces backlash for his shifting stance on free speech. Hayes, who once applauded Fox News for firing Tucker Carlson, is now condemning ABC for suspending Jimmy Kimmel after the late-night host made controversial remarks about Charlie Kirk.

On Wednesday’s broadcast, Hayes argued that Kimmel’s suspension “renders the First Amendment meaningless.” Yet, clips resurfaced from April 2023 show Hayes celebrating Carlson’s termination, accusing him of spreading offensive rhetoric and declaring that people eventually become “unpopular on the national stage” if they continually “dehumanize” others.

Confusion Over Jimmy Kimmel’s Future

As the debate rages, uncertainty remains over Kimmel’s future on ABC. While insiders hinted his show could return within days, Sinclair Broadcast Group, a major distributor of the program, has refused to reinstate it until Kimmel donates to Turning Point USA—the conservative organization founded by the late Charlie Kirk, whose tragic death in Utah has shaken political circles nationwide.

Instead of Kimmel’s show, Sinclair plans to air a tribute to Kirk. This bold move demonstrates how media conglomerates are leveraging their platforms in the middle of a national debate on speech, comedy, and respect for the fallen conservative leader.

Trump and FCC Weigh In

Former President Donald Trump, speaking at a UK press conference, mocked Kimmel’s suspension. “He was fired because of bad ratings more than anything else,” Trump said. “Jimmy Kimmel is not a talented person. He should have been gone long ago.”

Meanwhile, FCC Chairman Brendan Carr, newly appointed under Trump, has launched investigations into multiple networks including ABC, CBS, and NBC. Carr’s watchdog role has gained attention, particularly as Disney seeks approval for ESPN’s acquisition of the NFL Network and Nexstar pursues its $6.2 billion purchase of Tegna.

A Debate Bigger Than Kimmel

The Kimmel controversy highlights deeper questions about media consistency and whether free speech protections are applied equally across the political spectrum. Critics argue that figures like Hayes reveal a double standard—defending allies under the First Amendment while cheering the removal of ideological opponents.

In the coming days, decisions by ABC, Sinclair, and federal regulators could shape not only Kimmel’s career but also the broader conversation on how America defines freedom of expression in media.