Due to its https://www.volumepillshelper.com/author/volumepillshelper/page/13/ somewhat more narrow focus and broader exclusions, the Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR) is not considered among the comprehensive modern data privacy laws in the U.S. The same goes for the Nevada Privacy of Information Collected on the Internet from Consumers Act (NPICICA) and Amendment SB-260, though that law is older and predates even California’s CCPA. Companies that treat personal data as a trust rather than a transaction will not only avoid penalties; they’ll stand out in a market where integrity is the rarest currency of all. The Privacy Act of 1974 governs how federal agencies can collect and use data about individuals in its system of records. The act prohibits agencies from disclosing personal information without written consent from the individual, subject to limited exceptions including to the Census Bureau for statistical purposes. Individuals reserve the right to request their records, request a change to their records if they are inaccurate or incomplete, and to be protected against unwarranted invasion of their privacy.

Footer Menu Legal Links

Instead, they emphasize the need to implement reasonable security safeguards based on context and to adopt a risk-based approach, weighing exposure to foreign laws like U.S. surveillance alongside cybersecurity threats and data sensitivity. The term “data sovereignty” means ensuring that data collected, stored, or otherwise processed in Canada remains primarily subject to Canadian law. These enacted laws span a wide range of policy areas, reflecting experimentation in regulatory scope among lawmakers. In 2025 alone, states enacted laws addressing frontier model risk (such as California’s SB 53 and New York’s RAISE Act), generative AI transparency, AI use in health care settings, liability standards, data privacy, innovation, and synthetic content. Additionally, one of the clearest trends among enacted laws in 2025 included the growing focus on AI chatbots.

We’re one of the fastest growing law firms in Australia and operate entirely online. Under a stricter privacy regime, keeping data longer than you need (or without a clear purpose) can become a legal and security risk. 5 For this field, New Jersey was not included in the same company as Colorado and California for financial incentive notices because New Jersey does not require the extensive level of detail that we see for such https://www.fileoasis.com/72458/screenshot-privacy-drive-portable.html notices under the privacy laws of Colorado and California. Bari, meanwhile, urged providers and payers to take an active role in educating patients about the risks of sharing health data through unsecured channels.

Risk Specialist, Amazon

The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional. NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. Currently, 20 states have comprehensive data privacy laws on the books, each with unique definitions, opt-out rights, and enforcement mechanisms. Unlike the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the US lacks a single, overarching privacy law.

The Legislation

The tables below summarize certain key details of the state privacy bills introduced during the 2026 legislative cycle. “It’s not easy to comply with differing restrictions or requirements on different data from different places,” Levine said. “You have a number of challenging laws that entities have to navigate,” Levine said.

Some of the most consequential points to pay attention to are what the bill leaves out. The draft contains no Data Protection Impact Assessment requirements, no express treatment of automated decision-making or artificial intelligence beyond a narrow opt-out from fully automated profiling, and no requirement to honor universal opt-out mechanisms. It instead tasks the Secretary of Commerce with studying opt-out signals and reporting within three years. As the value of AI infrastructure continues to climb, data center development spreads, and threat actors increasingly go after supply-chains to reach their targets, security threats to data centers are unlikely to die down. And while some companies get to occupy entire data centers, known as hyperscalers, others have to share with roommates. But heightened risks should prompt them to ramp up their training and pressure-test their disaster management plans if data centers were to go down, industry insiders said.

Master of Legal Studies in Cybersecurity, Risk and Governance

Most of the US state privacy laws are fairly similar, but Maryland has claimed to have passed the one that is the most strict. We use a third party service to embed video content that may collect data about your activity. To learn more about this topic, view Introduction to US Privacy and Data Security Regulations and Requirements. The quoted remarks referenced in this article were made either during this webinar or shortly thereafter during post-webinar interviews with the panelists. One of the trickiest parts of compliance is understanding what counts as ‘personal information.’ Under US law, the term varies widely. California’s legislature has passed several AI-related bills, defining AI and regulating the largest AI models, generative AI training data transparency, algorithmic discrimination and deepfakes in election campaigns.

CFPB Keeps Its Enforcement and Supervision Resources Focused on Pressing Threats to Consumers

It conducts periodic investigative sweeps of high-risk industries, businesses, and practices. They include additional rights for consumers and new obligations for businesses. A notable CPRA change is the creation of the California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) that’s responsible for implementing and enforcing the law. In its bankruptcy announcement, 23andMe said the data privacy of its customers would be an “important consideration” in any sale.

Illinois BIPA (740 ILCS 14) is the most consequential, providing a private right of action with damages of $1,000 per negligent violation and $5,000 per intentional violation. Major settlements include Facebook ($650 million), BNSF Railway ($228 million jury verdict), Google ($100 million), and TikTok ($92 million). Penalties for failing to notify range from minimal in some states to substantial in others. Texas can impose $100 to $250,000 per breach plus $50,000 per day for delayed notification. Florida assesses $1,000 per day for the first 30 days, escalating to $50,000 per 30-day period, with a $500,000 cap. Students will explore Cybersecurity, Risk, and Governance through interdisciplinary legal studies.

• “Sensitive information” is already treated more strictly under Australian privacy law (for example, health information and biometric data).
• The Federal Trade Commission is a key regulator responsible for assessing compliance with laws that affect data privacy.
• Which one happens depends almost entirely on how the FTC uses its new authority and whether state attorneys general coordinate with it or compete with it.
• Personal data about teens under the age of 16 would be treated as sensitive data under the draft bill.
• Typically, there has been a lead time of a couple of years between when legislation is passed and a new law comes into effect, giving businesses and other organizations time to familiarize themselves with the law’s contents and requirements.
• Every state’s data breach notification law applies to businesses of all sizes.

Data that is publicly available, like government records, is not typically considered personal data. In today’s digital economy, almost every organization, whether a global bank, a healthcare provider, or a start-up, relies on the collection and analysis of personal data. In fact, data privacy and security have become central to how businesses earn and maintain public trust. The Federal Trade Commission is a key regulator responsible for assessing compliance with laws that affect data privacy. Its enforcement actions protect consumers from unfair or deceptive practices and impose federal privacy and data protection regulations.